On the other hand, zero product brought proof variance heterogeneity between the sexes

Users

A total of 923 students taken care of immediately the fresh new COBADI dos.0 survey (Table 1). The take to consisted mostly of women (81.2%), more youthful (median decades = (5.2), min. = 17, max. = 50), as well as in its first year at the college (fifty.2%). Bayesian inference lets us familiarize yourself with inequitable trials regarding gender since it allows the addition of brand new investigation to own coding afterwards. Brand new questionnaire is actually delivered digitally so you’re able to children learning Social Training and Public Works (Universidad Pablo de Olavide) and Pedagogy (UNED) into the educational age and you will . There had been no limitations to your evlilik arayan gГјzel bosnian kadД±nlar contribution, without financial or informative added bonus is actually offered to take part within analysis.

Results

With the George and Mallery (2003) classification, we found that the questionnaire had a high degree of overall reliability (? _Cronbach = .83 (.81–.85), Guttman’s ?6 = .86). We also found a high degree of reliability in the subscale “Competences in the use of ICT for the search and treatment of information” (? _Cronbach = .85 (.85–.89), Guttman’s ?6 = .87), moderate reliability in the subscale “Interpersonal competences in the use of ICT at university” (not considering items based on a preference scale, ? _Cronbach = .65 (.58–.7), ?6 Guttman’s ?6 = .59), and moderate reliability in the scale “Virtual and social communication tools at university” (? _Cronbach = .62 (.56–.68), Guttman’s ?6 = .51). The general descriptive results show (Table 3) that the vast majority of students have access to an Internet connection (98.2%). The time spent on the Internet is distributed among the following activities: university work (68.3%), use of social networks (63.9%) and listening to music (53.3%). It is significant that 77.8% stated that they never use Internet for gaming online, and 50.1% never use it to make new friends.

Throughout the outcomes for “Competences about use of ICT towards look and cures of information”, we note that one another female and male children getting he has got an excellent amount of competence on entry to “search engines like google”, “internet browsers”, “electronic cartography” and you may “podcasting”. The various tools they use with less promise is “QR codes” while the creation of “online presentations”. Gender difference try apparent regarding access to “digital cartography”, which have a good Bayes grounds off , and this demonstrates that the content is actually moments very likely to come about hypothesis one to says there is certainly a big change anywhere between men and you will women students compared to the brand new hypothesis out-of equivalent skills ranging from the sexes. This shows which is quite strong or definitive proof when you look at the go for out-of a big change ranging from males and females, with a sized effectation of .34 (.17, .51). For this reason, there was facts that men children has actually better seen competence inside electronic cartography compared to the feminine people. This perception try sustained into inclusion away from a past shipment having an enthusiastic roentgen parameter of 1.5 (Bayes grounds = , very strong or decisive evidence). With regards to proficiency within the “online presentations”, the results tell you a great Bayes factor regarding 7.31, and this demonstrates the info was eight.30 times very likely to can be found in the newest theory there are an improvement ranging from female and male pupils than in the new theory of equal proficiency between your sexes. This indicates there is positive or good proof of good difference in the male and women people, with a size of effectation of .twenty eight (.ten, .45). Therefore, there can be evidence that the men have better detected proficiency from inside the developing “on the internet presentations” compared to female. It impression is actually sustained whenever and a prior distribution with an r factor of 1.5 (Bayes basis = 5.36), while the shown inside Fig. 1.