The brand new Salvadoran Human Rights Payment: Study Running, Investigation Symbolization, and you will Producing Analytical Accounts

Baseball, P. (2000). During the P. Basketball, H. F. Spirer, & L. Spirer (Eds.), Making the Instance: Examining Large scale People Rights Violations Having fun with Pointers Expertise and you can Study Investigation. AAAS.

Belin, T. Roentgen., & Rubin, D. B. (1995). A technique having calibrating untrue-matches cost inside listing linkage. Journal of your American Mathematical Relationship, 90(430), 694–707.

Bilenko, Yards., & Mooney, R. J. (2003). Transformative Copy Recognition Using Learnable String Similarity Procedures. During the KDD ’03 (pp. 39–48). ACM.

Christen, P. (2008). Automated Checklist Linkage Having fun with Seeded Nearby Neighbour and you may Help Vector Server Category. Into the KDD ’08 (pp. 151–159). ACM.

Christen, P. (2012). A study away from indexing techniques for scalable number linkage and you will deduplication. IEEE Transactions on Education and you may Research Technologies, 24(9), 1537–1555.

Cohen, W., Raviku). An assessment off sequence metrics to possess complimentary labels and you may info. Inside the KDD workshop to your study cleanup and you can object consolidation (Vol. 3, pp. 73–78).

Copas, J., & Hilton, F. (1990). Listing linkage: Analytical habits getting coordinating desktop records. Diary of your own Regal Analytical People, Show A great, 153(3), 287–320.

Dai, An excellent. M., & Storkey, An excellent. J. (2011). The categorized copywriter-thing model to own unsupervised organization quality. When you look at the Phony sensory networking sites and you will host studying–icann 2011 (pp. 241–249). Springer.

Fortini, Meters., Liseo, B., Nuccitelli, A beneficial., & Scanu, Yards. (2001). Towards the Bayesian Listing Linkage. Search within the Specialized Statistics, 4(1), 185–198.

Gutman, R., Afendulis, C., & Zaslavsky, A good. (2013). A beneficial bayesian procedure of document connecting to analyze prevent- of-life scientific can cost you. Journal of one’s American Analytical Association, 108(501), 34–47.

Hsu, W., Lee, Meters. L., Liu, B., & Ling, T. W. (2000). Mining Exploration within the Diabetics Database: Results and you may Results. Within the KDD ’00 (pp. 430–436). ACM.

A torn-blend Markov strings Monte Carlo process of the newest Dirichlet techniques mixture design

Jewell, N. P., Spagat, M., & Jewell, B. L. (2013). MSE and you may Casualty Matters: Assumptions, Interpretation, and you may Demands. Into the T. B. Seybolt, J. D. Aronson, & B. Fischhoff (Eds.), Relying Civil Casualties: An overview of Recording and you will Quoting Nonmilitary Fatalities in conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford College Force.

Larsen, Yards. D. (2002)ments toward Hierarchical Bayesian Checklist Linkage. Into the Legal proceeding of your combined statistical conferences, part to the survey research measures (pp. 1995–2000). The fresh Western Mathematical Organization.

Steorts, R

Larsen, Yards. D. (2005). Improves during the Number Linkage Principle: Hierarchical Bayesian List Linkage Principle. During the Legal proceeding of your own shared mathematical group meetings, section for the questionnaire search tips (pp. 3277–3284). This new Western Analytical Organization.

Larsen, M. D., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Iterative automatic list linkage using mix designs. Diary of the American Mathematical Connection, 96(453), 32–41.

Lum, K., Rate, Meters. Elizabeth., & Banking institutions, D. (2013). Apps out of Several Possibilities Estimation during the Individual Rights Search. The new American Statistician, 67(4), 191–200.

Marchant, N. G., C., Kaplan, An effective., Rubinstein, B. We. P., & Elazar, D. Letter. (2019). D-blink: Marketed avoid-to-avoid bayesian entity solution.

McCallum, An effective., & Wellner, B. (2004). Conditional Varieties of Label Suspicion having Software in order to Noun Coreference. When you look at the Advances when you look at the sensory guidance operating systems (nips ’04) (pp. 905–912). MIT Drive.

Miller, P. L., Frawley, S. J., & Sayward, F. Grams. (2000). IMM/Scrub: A domain-Certain Unit on the Deduplication out of Inoculation Records Ideas from inside the Youthfulness Immunization Registriesputers and you can Biomedical Research, 33(2), 126–143.

Murphy, J., Brackbill, Roentgen. Yards., Thalji, L., Dolan, M., Pulliam, P., & Walker, D. J. (2007). Computing and you can Enhancing Publicity around the globe Exchange Center Wellness Registry. Statistics inside the Medicine, 26(8), 1688–1701.

Murray, J. S. (2016). Probabilistic list linkage and deduplication immediately following indexing, clogging, and you will filtering. Record from Privacy and Confidentiality, 7(1), 3–24.

Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. Meters., Axford, S. J., & James, An excellent. P. (1959). Automatic linkage out-of public information machines can be used to extract” follow-up” analytics away from household of records from regimen info. Research, 130(3381), 954–959.

Sadinle, M. (2014). Finding Copies from inside the a murder Registry Playing with a Bayesian Partitioning Approach. Annals regarding Used Statistics, 8(4), 2404–2434.

Sariyar, Yards., Borg, A beneficial., & Pommerening, K. (2012). Energetic Discovering Techniques for brand new Deduplication out of Digital Patient Research Having fun with Category Woods. Diary from Biomedical Informatics, 45(5), 893–900.

beautiful girls of Dehradun in India

C., Hall, Roentgen., & Fienberg, S. E. (2016). A good Bayesian Method to Graphical List Linkage and Deduplication. Log of one’s Western Statistical Association, 111(516), 1660–1672.

Tancredi, A great., & Liseo, B. (2011). Good hierarchical Bayesian method to record linkage and you may society proportions issues. Annals out-of Used Statistics, 5(2B), 1553–1585.